|
Teaching in our schools today is rather different from in previous
decades. Teachers, pupils, communities and society have changed and
developed, and technology has made a huge impact. We talk of accountability and appraisal, SAT's scores and measurable
outcomes, league tables and competition between schools. Somewhere,
the pupil as a whole person is in danger of getting lost beneath the
demands of all these outside constraints. At the same time, the wider concerns are still there - both for legislators
and for teachers. The 1988 Education Reform Act in England and Wales
required schools to "promote the spiritual, moral, cultural,
mental and physical development of pupils". This was further
formalised by the Education (Schools) Act 1992, which saw the birth
of OFSTED (the Office for Standards in Education), and of regular
schools' inspections. Amongst other things, Registered Inspectors
have to report on "the spiritual, moral, social and cultural
development of pupils". These are not new considerations, they
have always been there, but teachers are now giving more thought to
this more fundamental dimension of education - the personal development
of their pupils. This renewed emphasis has spawned a mass of literature, seminars,
consultations and conferences. A whole new language began to appear
with much talk of the "four adjectives" or of "SMSC"
(spiritual, moral, social and cultural). If that suggests that the
person consists of four separate and unrelated 'bits', more recent
talk of 'personal development' has re-affirmed the wholeness of the
person. The development of the whole person is clearly a whole school issue.
It cannot be restricted to RE and assemblies and so become the responsibility
only of those involved in these aspects of school life, of central
importance though they may be. Also important to personal development,
taking place as it does through personal relationships, especially
those between teacher and pupil, is the ethos of the school. This
pervades all aspects of the life of the school - in the classroom,
in the playground, in the assembly-hall or in the bus queue. The QCA (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority) Forum on Values
in Education and the Community (1997) has emphasised the importance
of considering values in all subjects of the curriculum. The QCA's
school pilot guidance materials will contribute to the revision of
the National Curriculum for the year 2000. It is envisaged that consideration
of values should then be given much greater prominence in classroom
teaching. The OFSTED discussion paper Spritual, Moral, Social and Cultural
Development (February 1994) claims that the promotion of spiritual
and moral development in all schools should be a whole-curriculum
matter. It goes on to say that "to move to such a place where
subjects see themselves in this way might seem to require a sea-change
in attitudes and approaches, but certainly the potential is there". The school, and here this means all teachers in every subject across
the curriculum, is encouraged to create opportunities which: For some teachers, the responsibility that they are now given for
the personal development of their pupils could be an added burden.
For others it is a welcome return to educating pupils in a more holistic
manner, refocused away from the exam success mentality. For all teachers
in every part of the curriculum, it is an opportunity to enhance their
teaching styles and resources. The Charis Project was set up to produce classroom resources for
teachers who are beginning to effect the sea- change in attitudes
and approaches to the curriculum called for by OFSTED. The first three
subject-areas tackled were English, Mathematics and Modern Foreign
Languages (French and German) with Science being added subsequently.
The resources have been designed with the needs of pupils aged 14
- 16 years in mind. The teachers in the writing teams have sought to produce materials
which will help their colleagues to create the opportunities set out
above. In particular, they are concerned to: It is recognised that there is much that is held in common among
people of various faith perspectives and of no particular religious
outlook. Values are often very widely shared and there can be quite
general agreement on what is true, beautiful or good. The Charis resources
seek to promote these common values. At the same time, the reasons
why they are held and the basic beliefs about reality in which they
are grounded differ from one perspective to another. These fundamental
differences lead to different total outlooks and to detailed differences
on which qualities, attitudes and actions are truly moral and/or spiritual.
The Charis Project is based on the belief that these differences and
the distinctives of the Christian perspective are significant and
that understanding this is an important element in a pupil's education
and personal development and a positive preparation for life in our
contemporary plural society. We are often asked why Charis was chosen as the name of the project.
We tried without success to invent a catchy acronym. The modern foreign
languages teachers said we could not have an English word in the title
of a French or German book so we went to Greek and Hebrew. Somebody
said "charis" and we all realised how well its idea of grace
and giving fitted in with one of our concerns - to provide an antidote
to the consumerist "me-first" assumptions of some curriculum
resources. So it became the Charis Project! The Charis resources are offered as a starting point with ideas to
help teachers to promote the personal development of their pupils
while still teaching their examination syllabus. It is also our intention
that, in using these materials, teachers will be encouraged to develop
their own resources and their own methodologies for the promotion
of spiritual and moral development through their subject-area. In
preparing them, we have experienced something of a sea-change in our
own attitudes and approaches. We hope that they may stimulate our
colleagues to produce more and better resources. John Shortt and Alison Farnell |